Friday, July 18, 2008

APS says global warming should be looked at

When Pope Algore reads this he will faint.

With this issue of Physics & Society, we kick off a debate concerning one of the main conclusions of the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the UN body which, together with Al Gore, recently won the Nobel Prize for its work concerning climate change research. There is a considerable presence within the scientific community of people who do not agree with the IPCC conclusion that anthropogenic CO2 emissions are very probably likely to be primarily responsible for the global warming that has occurred since the Industrial Revolution. Since the correctness or fallacy of that conclusion has immense implications for public policy and for the future of the biosphere, we thought it appropriate to present a debate within the pages of P&S concerning that conclusion. This editor (JJM) invited several people to contribute articles that were either pro or con. Christopher Monckton responded with this issue's article that argues against the correctness of the IPCC conclusion, and a pair from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, David Hafemeister and Peter Schwartz, responded with this issue's article in favor of the IPCC conclusion. We, the editors of P&S, invite reasoned rebuttals from the authors as well as further contributions from the physics community. Please contact me (jjmarque@sbcglobal.net) if you wish to jump into this fray with comments or articles that are scientific in nature. However, we will not publish articles that are political or polemical in nature. Stick to the science! (JJM)


Something is happeniong here dear chums. A year ago P&S said the discussion was done. Over with. Don't bother me.

Large organizations and especually technical journals don't change easily. First there are egos, and yes, careers to consider. That they reopen the door is both startling and telling.


APS




1 comment:

  1. So, this is biased as well?

    For the three months ended June 30, Microsoft said it earned $4.3 billion, or 36 cents per share, on revenue of $15.84 billion for the fiscal fourth quarter ended June 30. That was within the range Microsoft forecast in April, although revenue was slightly higher than the $15.7 billion First Call estimate and per-share earnings were a penny lower than First Call projections.

    The sky is falling:

    "Our online services was off slightly from what our expectations as well as our business division was down slightly," Brod said.

    ReplyDelete