"Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "What Dr Curry said":
I can read just fine, which is why I linked to Dr. Curry's blog entry where she specifically denies saying what the tabloid printed. You keep printing it, hoping that will make it true, but it doesn't. "
Yeah, numb nuts I deleted the insult.... My blog... And you're stupid enough to keep on showing up...
Oh well... Let me again use your source...
"The objective of improving climate models for societal needs is based upon three dubious premises:
- climate models are fit for this purpose
- climate models are useful for this purpose
- climate models are the best choice for this purpose
- Regional climate variability and change
- Network of teleconnection climate regimes on DEC-CEN timescales
- Predictions of emergent phenomena, e.g. abrupt climate change
Fundamental issues for climate models: with the focus on societal needs and the large investment in IPCC production runs, climate models are becoming less fit for the purpose of increasing our understanding of the climate system
Re-orient the science-policy interface to decision making under deep uncertainty, robust decision making and scenario thinking
Re-orient climate modeling development and applications to support the creation of a broad range of future scenarios
- refocus climate model development to emergent phenomena, extreme events, and natural internal variability
- emphasis on ensemble size"
Numb nuts, that is deeply flawed. That she doesn't like what she has said to be characterized in two words is moc nix. She said/wrote what she said/wrote. And only a fool can't see that.
Now Dummy also wrote:
My "real moniker"? You mean a real pretend name, like you use? Do you actually believe that using your real/fake name means you have "guts"? Not where I come from, but maybe you come from an area where people habitually make accusations and insults using fake names (aka "monikers") without having the courage to post their real name. You show me yours and I'll show you mine!
Yeah, Dummy, a moniker is a pretend name. People use them on the Internet to provide privacy from the nut cases of the world. AND to allow people to see that they are consistent in their positions. Like a real "name" a moniker identifies the person.
And you know that. But you don't want to follow the rules. Obviously rules are for everyone else.
Now, write something that is intelligent and amusing or don't bother.
"Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them." - Karl Popper
“It’s the presumption that Obama knows how all these industries ought to be operating better than people who have spent their lives in those industries, and a general cockiness going back to before he was president, and the fact that he has no experience whatever in managing anything. Only someone who has never had the responsibility for managing anything could believe he could manage just about everything.” - Thomas Sowell in Reason Magazine