To all the Democrats who think we are dumb

and will believe their BS that the failure of the bail out bill was the Repubs fault.......

Guess which finger I have extended upwards with the other four folded down.

First of all, to Barney Franks. Shut your mouth. You are one of the reasons we are here. You should, at the minimum, resign.

Secondly, to the MSM and the Leftie blogs.

The bill was crafted by the Democrats. The Democrats have a majority in Congress. The bill was supported by Bush, John McCain and Hussein. Yet the bill was defeated by 23 votes when 94 Democrats voted against it.

Well, duhhhhhhhh. Why was that???

The bill is unpopular. People are angry and don't understand they are cutting off their nose to spite their face. (Don't ask me how much I lost today, I don't want to think about it.) So Pelosi was caught telling Democrats in tough re-election campaigns they could vote against it.

Then she gave a highly partisan speech attacking the Repubs. How stupid. First she gives her troops permission to opt out and then attacks the Repubs rather than giving them any cover by stressing the need for bipartisanship.

That dear chums is just plain damn stupid.

The Democrats deserve whatever they eventually will get.

The country deserves better. A damn sight better.

Just the facts

Yeah, I used the pic last week but it is just so good...

that I couldn't resist. Click on this link.

Pelosi guides House Democrats in ushering in Depression

Pelosi is the worst House Majority Leader in history. It is hard to believe a politician needing support to pass a bill make such an arrogant, stupid and just plain wrong speech.

The shame is that CA will keep sending her back.

Link

With the banking system tottering and the financial markets crashing she manages to keep 124 Democrats from voting for a distasteful but necessary market bail out.

She was assisted by the worst Democratic candidate in history, Hussein of the "Call me if you need me" dynasty.

Well, chums... Where was he?? He couldn't persuade 10 of the 124 Demos who voted nay to vote yes? Couldn't he "reach across the aisle" and persuade 10 of the 96 Repubs that voted Nay to vote yes?

Obama's supporters in the press do it again

Did Palin agree with Hussein? Let's look at what she said:

Saturday night, while on a stop for cheesesteaks in South Philadelphia, Palin was questioned by a Temple graduate student about whether the U.S. should cross the border from Afghanistan into Pakistan.

"If that's what we have to do stop the terrorists from coming any further in, absolutely, we should," Palin said.

During Friday night's presidential debate in Mississippi, Obama took a similar stance and condemned the Bush administration for failing to act on the possibility terrorists are in Pakistan

.

Link

Now, let's note that she didn't say attack Pakistan. Let's note that she didn't say we should do it without permission from Pakistan. Let's note that she didn't say we do it based on "intelligence." She made a simple overhead statement that the media has spun while leaving out Biden's gaffe of Roosevelt addressing the country in 1929 on TV.

Now. Let's see what Hussein said:

Obama said if elected in November 2008 he would be willing to attack inside Pakistan with or without approval from the Pakistani government, a move that would likely cause anxiety in the already troubled region.

"If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will," Obama said.

Link

Hussein opines that we act after Pakistan has refused to. He is specific. His actions are based on "high value" targets identified by "intelligence." And the attack should be anywhere in Pakistan.

Palin's comment clearly notes a defensive action where the terrorists are invading from Pakistan. It doesn't put Pakistan on notice. It doesn't threaten action. It merely notes what we "should" do.

In this life there are vast differences between "should" and "will." I think most of us know what they are.

Even the rabid supporters of Hussien....aka the MSM.