Well, we have had bit of nasty weather and I have already heard that the snow and cold is caused by climate change caused by manmade global warming... I got to thinking and remembered a letter in the Tennessean I responded to last summer.... said summer was dry and very hot so naturally it was caused by manmade global warming.
I have long felt that the best way to understand what people are
writing is to carefully deconstruct something they have published. Such is the
case of Pam Jones who has a lengthy opinion piece in the Tennessean.
First, let me note that we have no knowledge of Ms Jones’ background.
She may be a highly educated scientist or she may be just another person with a
cause and time to spare.And then we have this:
“The revelation will cause fresh embarrassment for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which had to issue a humiliating apology earlier this month over inaccurate statements about global warming. ……….
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7111525/UN-climate-change-panel-based-claims-on-student-dissertation-and-magazine-article.html
I suppose if the Culman News reported the Second Coming Ms Jones would be on I65 heading south.
Uh, Ms Jones. We now know that global warming isn’t caused by CO2.
Jones writes: This is what a 1-degree Centigrade increase in global temperatures feels like. As the climate conversation develops, we need to focus on how to avoid even hotter temperatures in the future. Scientist warn that we must act now to keep the increase to only 2 degrees — beyond which we would be facing conditions we don’t want to think, much less talk, about. This is what a 1-degree Centigrade increase in global temperatures feels like. As the climate conversation develops, we need to focus on how to avoid even hotter temperatures in the future. Scientist warn that we must act now to keep the increase to only 2 degrees — beyond which we would be facing conditions we don’t want to think, much less talk, about.
Jones writes: Climate activist Bill McKibben has documented how much more CO2 we can pour into the atmosphere if we want to stop at 2 degrees: 565 gigatons. The fossil fuel industry holds assets that, if burned, will emit 2,795 gigatons — five times that maximum. One thing’s for sure: The oil, natural gas and coal industries are not interested in leaving those assets in the ground.
Jim
replies: Best I can tell McKibben is a prolific contributor to the magazine,
“Rolling Stone.” Now that is a source that I am sure we would like to use for
something like… say.. What pop culture hoodoo is interesting…. But not the life
and or death of modern civilization.
Jones
writes:ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson has admitted the reality of global warming
and what’s causing it, but glibly says we just need to adapt. He said this the
very week Nashville cooked at 109 degrees and Colorado Springs lost hundreds of
homes to a fire fueled by drought- and insect-ravaged trees.
Maybe
he can explain that to Tennessee farmers whose corn has been ruined. That’s a
conversation I’d love to hear.
Jim
replies: I know some farmers and the ones I know are very intelligent
hardworking people. They’d laugh at the nonsense Ms Jones is spewing. But I
digress.
The
fact is that Tillerson is not an expert and he is news worthy now because of whom
he is, not what he knows or his education. And that he agrees with the hoaxers.
Jones
writes: What I’m talking about now — at work, in the bookstore, and over the
fence when it’s finally cool enough in the evening to water my surviving tomato
plants — is how putting a price on carbon can stop global warming. A carbon fee
and dividend that returns revenue to the public would wean us off fossil fuels
without damaging our economy.
It’s
an idea that’s gaining support even among conservatives, notably former Reagan
economic adviser Arthur Laffer and former U.S. Rep. Bob Inglis. Perhaps our
senators, Lamar Alexander and Bob Corker, should have a chat with them about
this common-sense solution.
And what of the fossil-fuel companies who will
howl that a carbon fee will hurt them? Maybe they should start their own
conversation about how to adapt
Jim writes: Ah, now we come to the real reason
for her claims. Like most Left wingers she
want s a tax to modify behavior.
And like all Left wingers she thinks that you can take money from the
economy, give it to government, etc….
The question is, how much should we take and
what will it cost?? Should we increase the tax on gasoline by a dollar?? That
would sure slow down drivers. Should we charge a 30% tax on our utility bills?
Well, that would cause to be hot in the summer and cold in the winter.
But, would it stop global warming? No. That is
not something we can do.
As I started this deconstruction I noted that
I did not know anything about Ms Jones.
What I do know is that she is the President of the local chapter of an
organization that 99.999% of Americans know nothing or little about yet she
thinks she should lecture us?
I don’t think so Ms Jones. Please “fly away home.” Your children are
overheating and shouldn’t be alone.
"Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them." - Karl Popper
“It’s the presumption that Obama knows how all these industries ought to be operating better than people who have spent their lives in those industries, and a general cockiness going back to before he was president, and the fact that he has no experience whatever in managing anything. Only someone who has never had the responsibility for managing anything could believe he could manage just about everything.” - Thomas Sowell in Reason Magazine
No comments:
Post a Comment