Well, I watched Obamie this morning announcing that after deep reflections he had decided to nominate a racist for the SC.
You know, this guy is always reflecting. I mean he has the exact angle of holding his head so that the reflection will let him reach that exact spot that's hard to shave... I mention this to be sure you don't think that I think you think that I think reflecting isn't serious business.... But based on the results, I sure wish he would shoot from the hip...
And it will be interesting to see who in the Repub world has guts enough to condemn this person who obviously doesn't believe in the Constitution. I hope I'm wrong but after watching them roll over for the past three months I am not encouraged. Of course I am sure the Repub who voted for Obamie, aka Powell, will in the lead position telling us we should be more inclusive....
Now that is an interesting word... "inclusive." I have a question, dear chums. If I was a Repub and had to change for you to come to my party... Why in the hell would I want you???
And just in case the Repub Party leadership happens to read this... (Fat chance you say, but with Google you never know!)...... Reagan didn't win by being "inclusive." He won by offering a different vision, a different future, a different strategy...
Grow a set dear Repub leaders.... You might even win with'em... And you damn sure will lose without them!
Similarly, Greenburg stated that "Conservatives point to a speech she gave in 2001 at the University of California at Berkeley Law School, when she suggested her ethnicity shapes her decision," then quoted her statement during that speech, "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life." But when Sotomayor made that statement, she was specifically discussing the importance of judicial diversity in determining race and sex discrimination cases, and conservatives have previously highlighted the importance of the personal experiences of judicial nominees.As Media Matters for America has noted, during his 1991 Supreme Court confirmation hearings, responding to Sen. Herb Kohl's (D-WI) question, "I'd like to ask you why you want this job?" Clarence Thomas similarly stated in part: "I believe, Senator, that I can make a contribution, that I can bring something different to the Court, that I can walk in the shoes of the people who are affected by what the Court does." Moreover, former Bush Justice Department lawyer John Yoo has stressed that Thomas "is a black man with a much greater range of personal experience than most of the upper-class liberals who take potshots at him" and argued that Thomas' work on the court has been influenced by his understanding of the less fortunate acquired through personal experience.
ReplyDeleteAnd when she said policy was made at the appeals level she was just kidding....
ReplyDeletehahahahahahahhhahahahhahahaah