BUMP AND UPDATE
The problem is, no believes Obama. He writes books and no one believes what he says. He associates with self-identified terrorists who acts as Marxists and no one believes that he agrees with the Marxists. He tells us on TV that he wants to redistribute the wealth, and no one believes.
And even tells us that he needs a "Civilian National Security Force" that is just as strong, just as powerful, just as well funded as the military... and nobody believes him. Let's review this.
Click on this for the video of Obama.I mean, how could he put this together.
Well, welcome to HR Bill 1188.... It spells it all out. We will have a volunteer mandatory force. And it has already passed the House and is in the Senate to be scheduled for a vote.
The U.S. House of Representatives has approved a plan to set up a new "volunteer corps" and consider whether "a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people" should be developed.
The legislation also refers to "uniforms" that would be worn by the "volunteers" and the "need" for a "public service academy, a 4-year institution" to "focus on training" future "public sector leaders." The training, apparently, would occur at "campuses."
The vote yesterday came on H.R. 1388, which reauthorizes through 2014 the National and Community Service Act of 1990 and the Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973, acts that originally, among other programs, funded the AmeriCorps and the National Senior Service Corps.
It not only reauthorizes the programs, but also includes "new programs and studies" and is expected to be funded with an allocation of $6 billion over the next five years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
Many, however, are raising concerns that the program, which is intended to include 250,000 "volunteers," is the beginning of what President Obama called his "National Civilian Security Force" in a a speech last year in which he urged creating an organization as big and well-funded as the U.S. military. He has declined since then to elaborate.
WND LinkNow I know, I know. World Net Daily can be a little hysterical from time to time, and besides that it is composed of people who believe in God, think we are a Constitutional Republic... all that kinda stuff... so maybe we should take it with a grain of salt.
So let's do this! Let's go to a government web site, and see what the Bill says.
Not, mind you, what I think, or WND thinks.... But just the words from the Bill.
Expresses the sense of the Congress that the number of AmeriCorps, VISTA, and NCCC participants should reach 250,000 by 2014.
Okay, fair enough. That's obviously the National Civilian Security Force he was talking about. Now, what else should we notice?
If we are talking about volunteers, why not call them "volunteers." But that isn't the word....
of AmeriCorps, VISTA, and NCCC participants should reach 250,000 by 2014
Such a simple thing, but if you mean volunteers and you are writing a law, why not write what you mean?
Congressional Commission on Civic Service Act - Establishes a Congressional Commission on Civic Service to provide recommendations to Congress on improving opportunities for individuals to volunteer or perform national service.
Let's look at the end phrase
on improving opportunities for individuals to volunteer or perform national service
Now that's strange. If they are talking about volunteers, wouldn't you just write:
"on improving opportunities for individuals to volunteer
for national service"
I mean, why the awkward wording? Why the "to perform?" Simple. Anyone reading it next year can see plainly that the act is meant to help people volunteer...... but if not enough do so.... be required "to perform."
LinkAnd why would Obama need such?
Anybody here ever hear of the SS? Brown shirts? They were the folks who established and ran the Nazis for Hitler. Now I know that puts me in the "Oh he's paranoid pile," but just sit down and start thinking.
And what is the other trait that dictators share? They are in front of the people continually. Have you been able to turn your TV on lately without seeing Obama??
THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF SENATORS WHO VOTED AGAINST THE BILL. IF YOUR SENATOR'S NAME IS NOT THERE THEN HE/SHE VOTED FOR IT.
Barrasso (R-WY)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Coburn (R-OK)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Ensign (R-NV)
Graham (R-SC)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Kyl (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Not Voting - 1
Dorgan (D-ND)
