Saturday, November 2, 2013

Having fun fun with jondee and Yman.






Every now and then the old cowboy gets to zap some folks that desperately need to be shown up.

Over on http://www.talkleft.com/I had this discussion on this thread.

http://www.talkleft.com/story/2013/10/25/142426/19/blogrelated/Friday-Open-Thread

It started here.

Gee (5.00 / 3) (#75) 
by MO Blue on Sun Oct 27, 2013 at 08:11:53 AM CST 
When are you and your tea party friends going to raise a ruckus for something worthwhile - like single payer rather than just wearing stupid hats and making up silly little slogans. 

Parent | Reply to This
Have you forgotten that I have (none / 0) (#102) 
by jimakaPPJ on Mon Oct 28, 2013 at 11:41:56 AM CST 
posted numerous times that I am for a single payer system based on the Medicare model and paid for by a federal sales tax collected at the POS (not a VAT)???????????


Evidently so.
But if I gave you a good rant I am pleased to be of service.
And no matter what the Tea Party is, was or will be the fact is that Obama either lied or didn't know when he said:
You can keep your doctor
You can keep your insurance
Your premiums will go down.
In either case the answer is unacceptable but not surprising to anyone who wasn't blinded by "hope and change."

lol 
Which led to this:
 




I like how you always sum it up (5.00 / 3) (#110) 
by jondee on Tue Oct 29, 2013 at 07:39:32 AM CST 
at your blog: he wants Americans to suffer because he hates colonialism and subconsciously identifies with his Muslim father..
You should remember to include that part here, Jim. It lends more credibility to your hard-hitting, unbiased, critique. 

Parent | Reply to This

Your words would (none / 0) (#117) 
by sj on Tue Oct 29, 2013 at 11:07:01 AM CST 
have a lot more weight if they weren't just words. We don't know each other's "real lives", but for words to have meaning they need to be followed with action. You say want single payer. But who did you vote for that would advocate for that? What agency did you support (with either money or time) that works for that goal?
Don't bother answering me. The question is for you to think about seriously, with no snark whatsoever. So I added no superfluous question marks. :) 


It's no bother, sj. (none / 0) (#128) 
by jimakaPPJ on Fri Nov 01, 2013 at 07:51:51 AM CST 

I am always happy to answer you. The need to educate you drives me to do so.

Obama never was for a single payer system modeled on Medicare paid for a national federal sales tax.

Neither was McCain or Romney.

But both were for strong national defense and a rational energy policy.

Two out of three aint bad. 

Parent | Reply to This

That was not the question (none / 0) (#130) 
by MKS on Fri Nov 01, 2013 at 08:32:18 AM CST 

Who did you support or what group did you support that advocated single payer?

Setting aside the Presidential race, how did you support single payer?  Did you vote for other Republicans too?  Did the person you voted for in your House race support single payer? 

Parent | Reply to This

You first (none / 0) (#131) 
by jimakaPPJ on Fri Nov 01, 2013 at 10:16:44 PM CST 


I'll make it easier for you, Jim (none / 0) (#132) 
by Yman on Sat Nov 02, 2013 at 06:16:04 AM CST 

Show me a single posting on your wingnut blog focused on your position we should have single-payer healthcare.

Heh. 

Parent | Reply to This

You first (none / 0) (#131) 
by jimakaPPJ on Fri Nov 01, 2013 at 10:16:44 PM CST 






And the trap was set.



I'll make it easier for you, Jim (none / 0) (#132) 
by Yman on Sat Nov 02, 2013 at 06:16:04 AM CST 

Show me a single posting on your wingnut blog focused on your position we should have single-payer healthcare.

Heh. 

Parent | Reply to This

Why don't you prove that there isn't?? (none / 0) (#133) 
by jimakaPPJ on Sat Nov 02, 2013 at 08:49:41 AM CST 


heh (none / 0) (#134) 
by jondee on Sat Nov 02, 2013 at 09:09:33 AM CST 

and while you're at it, prove irrefutably that there isn't a single post devoted to gay rights and women's right to choose.

Nah-nah betcha can't do it. 

Parent | Reply to This

ondee, your next (none / 0) (#137) 
by jimakaPPJ on Sat Nov 02, 2013 at 09:56:23 AM CST 

As I cool I can do some surfing the web. I've been hanging out at Talk Left for years and years. TL is focused on legal/crime issues and is more balanced than KOS or MoveOn but it does have its share of kooks and loons.

What runs some on the Left crazy is that I fancy myself a social liberal. I believe in minority rights, gay rights (including marriage), a woman's right to chose and think we need to rationalize our illegal drug policy.

On the other hand I am more or less opposed to "programs" dedicated to minorities, believing that we have moved past that point and need a color blind "helping hand" based on need and scholastic achievement.

And while I believe in "gay rights" that doesn't mean that I think we need "hate laws." If someone harms a gay or a straight person the deed speaks for itself. The reason why is of no consequence. And I will tell gays that the Bible says their actions are wrong, just as it says you shouldn't be humping your neighbor's wife but I will let them work out the details with God. He's been known to forgive and forget.

And I oppose abortion but I won't tell a woman what she must do with her body. I will also say that we need more church sponsored adoption centers and less Hell and Damnation from the pulpit.

The drug thing is a tough one. Some drugs are addictive and damaging to people and society. Problem is the demand drives the supply and the obscene profits keep an endless supply of drugs and dealers. My solution is simple. Flood the market with free drugs obtained by signing up at your local pharmacy.


And then...

I dislike such comments because all they do is make all the Lefties swoon and throw snit fits. And since they might harm themselves and not be around to see Obamie give his concession speech I am naturally against them.

Besides. I am for gay rights. And if Congress wanted to put up with a gay congressman who had let his lover run a whore house out of his apartment and if the good people of Boston wanted to keep electing him for some 30 years..... who am I to complain?

But I do heartily dislike certain things. One of them is people, such as the insulter, who claims to be with the Tennessee Tea Party.

Well, as the commercial now running every 30 minutes says... "There is no Tennessee Tea Party." (Pardon the paraphrase. Couldn't help myself.)

He is a member, perhaps an official of a Tea Party organization that calls itself the Tennessee Tea Party.

Not to belabor a point, but there is no formal organization of TN Tea Parties.


jondee, what a dummy you are. 

Parent | Reply to This

And since we're getting personal (none / 0) (#138) 
by jondee on Sat Nov 02, 2013 at 12:58:18 PM CST 

what a double-talking, dishonest, mean-spirited, entitled, bandwidth devouring, inbred fascist redneck you strike as. Sir. 

Parent | Reply to This

[new] hehe (none / 0) (#139) 
by jimakaPPJ on Sat Nov 02, 2013 at 01:47:01 PM CST 

jondee, whatever I am I am smarter than you.

And I proved it.

You got snookered by one of the oldest tricks in the world.

And thanks for proving what I have long claimed. Lefties like you hate anyone that don't agree with every thing they want. In that you are no different than the Far Right. Like them you aren't liberal and you aren't progressive. You just want to be in control. 

Parent | Reply to This

Can't do it, huh? (none / 0) (#135) 
by Yman on Sat Nov 02, 2013 at 09:15:10 AM CST 

I'm shocked. 

Parent | Reply to This

What a perfect straight man you are (none / 0) (#136) 
by jimakaPPJ on Sat Nov 02, 2013 at 09:44:21 AM CST 


Want more crow to eat??


And some more.


Now, let's put everyone under Medicare. Just send them all a Medicare card, include dental and Rx drugs in it, and pat ourselves on the back. We have been "fair."

Of course to be fair we are going to have to pay for the drugs we use, the Doctors and Nurses time and talents, not to mention all those other workers and infrastructure involved in saving our disgustingly fat behinds.

Feeling a little dumb right now??

Well, go kiss that life sized statue of Obama you worship and I'm sure you'll feel better!

ROFLMAO

How does that mouse trap hanging on your tongue feel?? 
 
Sometimes life is good.

Now, you gotta know the Lefties couldn't let it alone. They come back with the usual BS.

ee, Jim? (none / 0) (#142) 
by Yman on Sat Nov 02, 2013 at 09:05:25 PM CST 
I knew you could do it!  Finally, posting a link to back up your claims!  3 posts supporting single-payer, 4,258 posts screaming "Shariah law!" - but all you had to show is one, so...
If you think I "worship" Obama, you either: 1) haven't been paying attention, or 2) are more delusional than most of your crazy rants would indicate.

Maybe both. 

Parent | Reply to This
yman,like jondee (1.00 / 1) (#143) 
by jimakaPPJ on Sat Nov 02, 2013 at 11:01:19 PM CST 
you hate everyone who disagrees with any of your positions. You are incapable of accepting support on the items I listed because I disagree with you on others.
Sad. Very sad. And one of the reasons we can't move ahead.
And yes, you worship Obama and would vote for him again if he could run.
And the facts are that I proved my point and if you are willing to pay for me time I will provide additional links.

How does it feel to be played like a child?? 

Parent | Reply to This
"Played like a child" - heh (none / 0) (#144) 
by Yman on Sun Nov 03, 2013 at 05:08:26 AM CST 
Don't know, Jim - I've done it to you so many times - I figured you should be able to describe it very well by now.
The Obama worship stuff is just more of your typical cluelessness.  In case you've missed it, I've been extremely critical of Obama, particularly on this issue.  I think the ACA is a crappy piece of legislation that is greatly inferior to a public option and hugelyinferior to a single payer system.
As far as "your support", it's meaningless.  The extent of "your support" is a very few postings on a blog filled with rightwing rants about "Shariah law!" and clueless global warming denialism.
As far as "paying for your time", I'd be thrilled to.  We'll do an even trade.  I'll bill you for my time for the hundreds of links I've provided to you disproving your rightwing garbage, and you bill me for the 3 links you posted - plus any others you can find.  My normal hourly rate is $275/hour.  Yours is ... what

... like $10? 

Parent | Reply to This
yman, quit pretending (none / 0) (#145) 
by jimakaPPJ on Sun Nov 03, 2013 at 07:47:24 AM CST 
A claim was made.
I set the trap.
You fell through it and caught yourself.
You see, I am who I am. No pretense. No posturing. I believe what I believe based on a life experience so diverse that you cannot even imagine it.
So please keep on proving that you are not a liberal. You are not progressive. What you want is total control. You have this burning desire to have everyone do what you want and there is no halfway.
Think. Where you could have an allie on many issues you reject and attack.
That's typical of a narcissist personalty.
Sad.
So keep on attacking. My record speaks loud and clear. I have no reason to prove anything, yet I have.

And you have proved what you are. 

Parent | Reply to This
If you do hold these views (none / 0) (#146) 
by MKS on Sun Nov 03, 2013 at 07:50:10 AM CST 
have you recently voted for someone who also held these views?
If you don't, you just enable policies that are frankly retrograde. 

Parent | Reply to This
Have you?? (none / 0) (#148) 
by jimakaPPJ on Sun Nov 03, 2013 at 11:33:58 AM CST 
Certainly Obama did not. 

Parent | Reply to This
[new] Yes, on marriage equality (none / 0) (#150) 
by MKS on Sun Nov 03, 2013 at 12:13:36 PM CST 
An "ally" (none / 0) (#147) 
by Yman on Sun Nov 03, 2013 at 07:55:01 AM CST 
To what end, Jim?  An "allie" in posting on a blog?  An "allie" who makes ridiculous claims and supports them with links to British tabloids and wingnut blogs?  An "allie" who, even on the issue of single-payer, qualifies it by saying it should be paid for with the most regressive tax system possible (a national sales tax).
No thanks.

BTW - Are we billing for time or not?  I'm thinking a flat amount per link, say ... 5 minutes.  I'll work up an invoice and an installment plan for you to pay me.  I can root around in my sofa cushions for the money I owe you. 

Parent | Reply to This
The offer was you pay me for (none / 0) (#149) 
by jimakaPPJ on Sun Nov 03, 2013 at 11:38:14 AM CST 
more links.
I haven't claimed you didn't post something.
So put up or kindly admit you know that I can produce.
lol
The support for the items is self explanatory.
Both you and MKS, having lost the challenge, want to move the goal posts and reframe the argument.
How Leftie of you both.

[new] Sorry, Jim (none / 0) (#151) 
by Yman on Sun Nov 03, 2013 at 12:19:21 PM CST 
Fair is fair.  You want me to pay you for your links, you'll need to pay me for mine.  Hundreds of links @ $275/hour versus 3 links @ ($4/hour?) - I can understand why you wouldn't want to do that. 

Parent | Reply to This
[new] Okay yman. I give up. (none / 0) (#152) 
by jimakaPPJ on Sun Nov 03, 2013 at 02:33:31 PM CST 
You have no honor.
But the facts remain.
You folks made the challenge.
I met it.
Now, go whine some more.

Friday, May 10, 2013

On the Internet tax


I did this over at the Tennessean.
James Kershaw writes:
“The passage of this bill would benefit every retail and wholesale business located in Tennessee,”
This assumes that the TN merchant would get the business that is now going to the Internet. Since a great deal of the business going to the Internet is based on convenience, shopping from your desk at home, and unlimited selection and ease of finding a product, this is a false assumption.  For example, does your local book store have every book available that has been written by your favorite author? Highly doubtful. And to find out you’ve got to get up and drive to the store and then find the book and then find a clerk…. Contrast that with the ease of Ebay and Amazon…want a pair of shoes???? Just look at the selection available from Zappos.
……”and increase state revenues, thus benefiting all who live here.”
This assumes that EVERYONE will benefit based on some unknown action by an unknown agency of state government. Obviously the people who pay the additional taxes will benefit only to the extent that the result of the unknown action by the unknown agency exceeds their loss in real money. In addition, even those who lose no money may not benefit because giving more money to government does not guarantee a positive outcome. In fact, given that the money could be used in ways that reduce individual freedom, giving more money to government is like giving booze to an alcoholic. In fact, there is no real proof that government is too small and needs more money to provide actually needed services.
…….”A number of Tennessee-based businesses lose sales on a daily basis to Amazon eBay, and other Internet retailers, as those entities enjoy an immediate 9.25 percent price benefit.
At this time the large retailers, who have websites, charge TN sales taxes. Last evening, using the Internet, I ordered a part for one of our appliances. I was charged for the part, for shipping and state and local sales taxes. Again, my savings was in gasoline and shoe leather not spent in driving to a local merchant to order the part. Plus, it was painless.
It is reported that the bill passed by the Senate has this limit:
But under the proposed law, states would be able to require online sellers to collect sales tax if they have sales of at least $1 million outside of states where they have physical operations.
It is rather obvious that Amazon’s opposition to this bill is based on them having warehouses located  in multiple locations. But who is supporting the bill??
I think that he majority of the support comes from small business owners who think all purchases on the Internet will be subject to the tax and this will drive customers to their doors. This is false due to the reasons stated above.  Note to small business owners. Websites are inexpensive. Get one. They are as important to your future as window displays were in the past.
The second group of supporters are those, mostly Democrats and so-called “Progressives” who have never seen a tax they didn’t like, who believe that once in place the tax can easily be increased. That is true.
I don’t know what group James Kershaw belongs. Like too many he has been allowed to spout his opinion without telling us anything that would reveal his biases."Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them." - Karl Popper “It’s the presumption that Obama knows how all these industries ought to be operating better than people who have spent their lives in those industries, and a general cockiness going back to before he was president, and the fact that he has no experience whatever in managing anything. Only someone who has never had the responsibility for managing anything could believe he could manage just about everything.” - Thomas Sowell in Reason Magazine

Sunday, March 24, 2013

Republican Party decides to be more like Democrats


Hat tip to attackcartoons

Let me see.... They lost with DemoLite in 2008...they lost bigger in 2012 with DemoLiter....

Insanity is often defined as doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results.

"Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them." - Karl Popper

 “It’s the presumption that Obama knows how all these industries ought to be operating better than people who have spent their lives in those industries, and a general cockiness going back to before he was president, and the fact that he has no experience whatever in managing anything. Only someone who has never had the responsibility for managing anything could believe he could manage just about everything.” - Thomas Sowell in Reason Magazine

Friday, March 22, 2013

Lest we forget what the Democrats


thought, along with their brother Repubs.


I mean the rewriting of history continues unabated.


"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

Hat tip to ESteel





"Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them." - Karl Popper

 “It’s the presumption that Obama knows how all these industries ought to be operating better than people who have spent their lives in those industries, and a general cockiness going back to before he was president, and the fact that he has no experience whatever in managing anything. Only someone who has never had the responsibility for managing anything could believe he could manage just about everything.” - Thomas Sowell in Reason Magazine

Friday, February 15, 2013

Tebow speaks




Bits and pieces and other stuff…

The media world is all aflutter that Tebow is speaking at church in Dallas that doesn’t embrace gays and doesn’t like Islam, Mormonism and Judaism.

On the religious side I see their point on Islam. But on the other two they need to lighten up. I mean Jews and Mormons don’t have thousands of radicals wanting to go to Paradise by offing off good liberal Baptists.

But why can’t Tebow speak at a church that says bad things about gays?? And before you Lefties get all in a dither and start blathering, remember I have posted I am for minority rights, including gay marriage. I mean I just don’t care and if I was looking for a church this one wouldn’t be on my list.  But…..

I mean look. You either believe in free speech or you don’t. This PC bullshit has gone too far.  Face it, folks. Tebow has taken a lot of trash because he is an avowed Christian and that makes a lot of you uncomfortable. So you attack him. And a church who teaches that Islam is bad…. But Islam has “members” who say the Koran says they should kill gays… and they do it.

Ah ha! You say??? Christianity and Islam are no different… Heh. The difference is that Christianity got rid of 99.9999% of the folks who want to kill gays years ago. Islam??? No so much.

Onward…….

This gives “wait a minute” a whole new meaning.


You know, if that meter had exploded over Russia back when I was looking for Soviet missiles and they were looking for US missiles… both sides with some fairly low tech  radar… we might have been at war. At the very least the phones would have been ringing in the White House.

Can anyone tell me why every picture of the mass murderer Dorner shows him with a big grin on his face… Speaking of grinning, Lamont Hill, the Columbia U professor who can’t understand why a mass murder should be used as a civil rights example… He can’t grasp that by doing so he is qualifying killing people because you think you’ve been hosed over a job…  O’Reilly gave him a good going over last night…


But Lamont didn’t get the message. He is living proof that Columbia U should lose its accreditation.  

This is all over the Internet. Hat tip to Larry P and Mike L for sending it to me.

My memory's not as sharp as it used to be.  Also, my memory's not as sharp as it used to be.

Now if I could just remember their last name……..

Speaking of names.. another anonymous asshole has commented on my post about the Left loving them some Navy seal murderer…

“Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Left Loves the Murder of Navy Seal":

Breibart: speaking of the karmic chickens coming home to roost..

Proving once again that the ethics of a Norway Rat, Nixonian dirty tricks, and cocaine don't mix.

Such a loss for the nation.”

Aint they just wonderful people??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3ctO7fdrcc








"Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them." - Karl Popper “It’s the presumption that Obama knows how all these industries ought to be operating better than people who have spent their lives in those industries, and a general cockiness going back to before he was president, and the fact that he has no experience whatever in managing anything. Only someone who has never had the responsibility for managing anything could believe he could manage just about everything.” - Thomas Sowell in Reason Magazine