With the east coast hit by a hurricane and now New Orleans about to get slapped by a tropical storm we can brace for a rash of lies by the man made global warming hoaxers.
Meanwhile, what you are not seeing on TV is this:
The science is now all-but-settled on global warming, convincing new evidence demonstrates, but Al Gore, the IPCC and other global warming doomsayers won’t be celebrating. The new findings point to cosmic rays and the sun — not human activities — as the dominant controller of climate on Earth.
The research, published with little fanfare this week in the prestigious journal Nature, comes from über-prestigious CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, one of the world’s largest centres for scientific research involving 60 countries and 8,000 scientists at more than 600 universities and national laboratories. CERN is the organization that invented the World Wide Web, that built the multi-billion dollar Large Hadron Collider, and that has now built a pristinely clean stainless steel chamber that precisely recreated the Earth’s atmosphere.
In this chamber, 63 CERN scientists from 17 European and American institutes have done what global warming doomsayers said could never be done — demonstrate that cosmic rays promote the formation of molecules that in Earth’s atmosphere can grow and seed clouds, the cloudier and thus cooler it will be. Because the sun’s magnetic field controls how many cosmic rays reach Earth’s atmosphere (the stronger the sun’s magnetic field, the more it shields Earth from incoming cosmic rays from space), the sun determines the temperature on Earth.
Link
Let me summarize what the CERN research shows. Cause and effect:
Sun’s Magnetic field increases
Cosmic rays hitting earth decrease
Clouds decrease
Temperature increases
Sun’s Magnetic field decreases
Cosmic rays hitting earth increase
Clouds increase
Temperature decreases
What the CERN experiment shows is the cause and effect of variations in the sun’s magnetic field on the creation of clouds and the temperature. And if does it in a method that is repeatable. That is the basis of the scientific method.
Everything else we have is based on “claims” and “consensus.” Claims, of course, are often based on bias and consensus is merely a bunch of people agreeing on something. Neither have any meaning in science.
OnTwitter I am Lesabre1 "Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them." - Karl Popper
“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves.” - William Pitt
"Logic. There is little logic among the cultural elite, maybe because there is little omnipresent fear of job losses or the absence of money, and so arises a rather comfortable margin to indulge in nonsense." - Victor Davis Hanson
